it's almost hilarious, but it's not

You know all those sites that everyone loves and I always think, "Uh, maybe if they knew what they were talking about more like 75% of the time, maybe. But not, so no," but I still read some of them? Yeah. So anyway, almost as if to serve as a shining beacon-like example of Lame, Gawker calls readers lame for assuming the site wasn't lame-ass lame enough to pull a totally lame April Fools lamefest. Readers, assuming that the site you read isn't lame is a lovely vote of confidence, but get real. Gawker, stay lame this summer. Don't change. K.I.T., lame-o, etc.

In other "Yes, I am a dork. Here is one more link from the Internets!" news, Right on. This is what I would say if I could say more than just "Ugh."